Monday, August 14, 2006

Lord's Day Thirty

Question 80

Comparison of the Lord’s Table and the Roman Catholic Mass


Lord’s Supper

Roman Mass

1

Jesus’ sacrifice, accomplished on the cross, alone guarantees pardon of sin

Hebrews 10:12

Pardon is only received when, in addition to his suffering on the cross, Christ is daily offered by the priests

2

Christ in his human nature is in heaven at the right hand of the Father, not concealed in the elements of the Supper

Acts 1:11; 3:21

The bread and wine by virtue of consecration are changed into his body and blood, that in opposition to the articles of the creed - incarnation, ascension, intercession and return in judgment

3

Christ is to be worshiped - in spirit and in truth, ascended to his Father in heaven

Acts 7:56; Hebrews8:1-2

Christ in the elements is to be worshiped {which is idolatry, worshiping what is created; regardless of what happens in the Mass, the bread and wine at least in some “accidental” sense still remain created entities; this also serves as point of confusion in evangelism - “Would you like to receive Christ?”} Here the sign is changed into the thing signified which defeats the purpose of a sacrament.

4

Our eternal state is determined before we leave this life

2 Corinthians 5:8; Philippians 1:21; Hebrews 9:27

Forgiveness of sin and deliverance for those in purgatory can be accomplished by the mass, as well as healing of the sick including animals, things that are not promised in the Gospel

5

Christ alone offered himself as a sacrifice to God

John 10:18

The priest offers Christ as a sacrifice - “Holy Father, Almighty and Eternal God, receive this immaculate host, which I, thine unworthy servant, offer unto thee... that it may result in salvation...unto everlasting life.”

The institution of the Lord’s Supper when understood properly in fact serves to prevent idolatrous worship - it is a regular reminder that Jesus accomplished in the single event of the cross all that is necessary for our redemption and there is no room to add anything further, either by sacrifice or by works.

Question 81 & 82

Proper subjects are those who:

  1. truly repentant [“displeased with themselves because of their sins”], and

  2. truly believe [“trust that their sins are pardoned for the sake of Christ”].

Since a purpose of the ordinance is to demonstrate union with Christ and his church, those characteristics which pertain to such a union must be present in the individual in order to make him a proper subject. This means the individual should be one who:

  1. has the ability to understand what is signified and to examine themselves to see if repentance and belief are present.

  2. certainly should have been baptized or, at the very least, a proper subject for baptism.

  3. exhibits true faith and repentance in their deportment or daily conduct.

Those who should not be admitted to the Lord’s Supper are such as demonstrate by word, deed or both a life of ungodliness, that is, an absence of true repentance and faith. Two considerations come to mind - Judas and the Corinthian church. While Judas participated in the original institution of the Supper, his profession and life up to that point was outwardly consistent with one who had true faith. Even though God knew that he had the heart of a traitor, it was only God who knew it at that point. Since we are not God and have only outward appearances by which to judge, we should not attempt to judge the heart but be content with what the individual demonstrates outwardly.

At the same time we cannot use our inability to discern the heart as an excuse for not making a judgment based on appearances. It seems the Corinthian church was not only lax in addressing moral issues (1 Corinthians 5) but also lax in permitting those who were truly unworthy to come to the Table. As is apparent from Paul’s commentary (for this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep 11:30) God takes abuse of the Table seriously. It is not clear from the text whether those afflicted were only the “abusers” or if it included those who knowingly tolerated or encouraged the abuse. Either way, we have a duty regardless of our role within the church family to admonish those who would be tempted to partake of the Lord’s Supper when it is improper for them to do so.

Resemblances between Passover and Lord’s Table


The Passover Type

The Thing Signified

1

The lamb

Exodus 12:3

Christ

1 Corinthians 5:7

2

Without blemish

Exodus 12:5

Sinless

Isaiah 53:9; 2 Corinthians 5:21;
1 Peter 2:22-24; 1 John 3:5

3

Killed and roasted

Exodus 12:6, 8

Suffered and died

Matthew 26:36-27:61; Mark 14:32-15:47
Luke 22:39-23:56; John 13:1-19:42

4

No bone broken

Exodus 12:46

Same

John 19:36

5

Doorposts sprinkled with blood

Exodus 12:7, 22

His satisfaction is imputed to us

Romans 4:23-25

6

That the angel of death might pass over

Exodus 12:12, 13, 23, 27

Deliverance from eternal death

John 5:24; John 10:27-30

7

In haste and traveling clothes

Exodus 12:11

Desire to progress in sanctification and expectation of eternal life; this world is not my home

Matthew 6:33

8

Eaten only by the circumcised

Exodus 12:48

Designed only for the regenerate

1 Corinthians 11:17-32


Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?